From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mouzon

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 8, 2013
No. 12-7818 (4th Cir. Feb. 8, 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-7818

02-08-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JEREMY MOUZON, a/k/a Ferris Earl Scott Green, Defendant - Appellant.

Jeremy Mouzon, Appellant Pro Se. Alston Calhoun Badger, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.


(2:03-cr-00896-PMD-1)


ORDER

The Court amends the unpublished per curiam opinion entered on December 27, 2012, by replacing the word "conviction," on line two of page two of the opinion, with "sentence."

Entered at the direction of the panel: Judge King, Judge Duncan, and Senior Judge Hamilton.

For the Court

Patricia S. Connor, Clerk

UNPUBLISHED


No. 12-7818

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. JEREMY MOUZON, a/k/a Ferris Earl Scott Green,

Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (2:03-cr-00896-PMD-1) Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeremy Mouzon, Appellant Pro Se. Alston Calhoun Badger, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jeremy Mouzon seeks to appeal his sentence for carjacking, using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Mouzon was sentenced in 2005 to a term of 360 months' imprisonment. On direct appeal, this court affirmed Mouzon's convictions and sentence. United States v. Mouzon, 178 F. App'x 193 (4th Cir. 2006). In October 2012, Mouzon filed another notice of appeal of the criminal judgment. However, because we have previously affirmed this criminal judgment, we dismiss the appeal as duplicative and untimely. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

United States v. Mouzon

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 8, 2013
No. 12-7818 (4th Cir. Feb. 8, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Mouzon

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JEREMY MOUZON, a/k/a…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 8, 2013

Citations

No. 12-7818 (4th Cir. Feb. 8, 2013)