From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mosha

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Jun 2, 2014
557 F. App'x 639 (8th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 13-3295

06-02-2014

United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Peter Salvatory Mosha Defendant - Appellant


Appeal from United States District Court

for the District of North Dakota - Bismarck


[Unpublished]

Before BYE, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Peter Salvatory Mosha appeals the district court's judgment following a jury verdict finding him guilty of making a false claim of citizenship for the purpose of unlawfully gaining employment, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1015(e). Mosha was sentenced to "time served," or 243 days in prison. Counsel has moved to withdraw, and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sufficiency of the evidence.

The Honorable Patrick A. Conmy, United States District Judge for the District of North Dakota.

This court reviews the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the guilty verdict, resolving conflicts in favor of the government, and accepting all reasonable inferences that support the jury's verdict. See United States v. Causevic, 636 F.3d 998, 1005 (8th Cir. 2011). The testimony of former Hardee's Manager Lori Thor—whose credibility was for the jury to decide—that Mosha indicated he was a United States citizen on the I-9 employment eligibility form, combined with evidence establishing he was not, was sufficient to support the conviction. See 18 U.S.C. § 1015(e) (penalizing individual for knowingly making "any false statement or claim that he is, or at any time has been, a citizen or national of the United States, with the intent . . . to engage unlawfully in employment in the United States"); United States v. Keys, 721 F.3d 512, 519-20 (8th Cir. 2013) (reviewing court must assume jury found credible witness testimony that was favorable to verdict), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 1011 (2014). This court has reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), and has found no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.

The judgment is affirmed, and counsel's motion to withdraw is granted.


Summaries of

United States v. Mosha

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Jun 2, 2014
557 F. App'x 639 (8th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Mosha

Case Details

Full title:United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Peter Salvatory Mosha…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Jun 2, 2014

Citations

557 F. App'x 639 (8th Cir. 2014)