From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mortenson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 24, 2011
Cr. No. S-10-193 EJG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2011)

Opinion

Cr. No. S-10-193 EJG

08-24-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ERIC MORTENSON, et al., Defendants.

BENJAMIN GALLOWAY Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant Eric Mortenson SCOTT L. TEDMON Attorney for Lawrence Davis, Jr. TIMOTHY WARRINER Attorney for Joel D. Clark


LAW OFFICES OF SCOTT L. TEDMON

A Professional Corporation

SCOTT L. TEDMON, CA. BAR # 96171

Attorney for Defendant

LAWRENCE DAVIS, JR.

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS

CONFERENCE AND FINDING OF EXCLUDABLE TIME


Date: August 26, 2011

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Judge: Hon. Edward J. Garcia

The United States of America, through Assistant U.S. Attorney Dominique Thomas; defendant Eric Mortenson, through his counsel Benjamin Galloway, Assistant Federal Defender; defendant Lawrence Davis, Jr., through his counsel Scott L. Tedmon; and defendant Joel D. Clark, through his counsel Timothy Warriner; hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. The current status conference in this case is set for Friday, August 26, 2011 at 10:00 a.m.

2. The government has provided over 21,000 pages of discovery to defense counsel. Counsel for each defendant needs additional time to review discovery, identify legal issues, determine investigative needs, confer with the government on possible case resolution, and discuss these matters with their respective client. Scott L. Tedmon, counsel for defendant Lawrence Davis; Benjamin Galloway, counsel for co-defendant Eric Mortenson; and Timothy Warriner, counsel for co-defendant Joel D. Clark; understands and agrees the requested additional time is necessary to allow each counsel to properly prepare their case and as such, each counsel concurs in this request. AUSA Dominique Thomas agrees to the defense request for necessary additional time to prepare.

3. As such, the government and all defense counsel stipulate it is appropriate to continue the current status conference to Friday, September 16, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. The Court's availability for the September 16, 2011 status conference date has been confirmed. No trial date has been set.

4. Accordingly, the parties stipulate the Court should find that time be excluded through September 16, 2011 under the Speedy Trial Act based on need of counsel to prepare pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), [Local Code T4], and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A), the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

Finally, Scott L. Tedmon has been authorized by counsel to sign this stipulation on their behalf.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

DOMINIQUE THOMAS

Assistant United States Attorney

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

BENJAMIN GALLOWAY

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant Eric Mortenson

LAW OFFICES OF SCOTT L. TEDMON

SCOTT L. TEDMON

Attorney for Lawrence Davis, Jr.

LAW OFFICES OF TIMOTHY WARRINER

TIMOTHY WARRINER

Attorney for Joel D. Clark

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING and based upon the above stipulation, the Court finds that time be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), [Local Code T4], reasonable time necessary for effective counsel preparation, and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A), the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that this case is continued to Friday, September 16, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., for further status conference.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), [Local Code T4], and 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the period from August 26, 2011, to and including September 16, 2011, is excluded from the time computations required by the Speedy Trial Act.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

EDWARD J. GARCIA

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Mortenson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 24, 2011
Cr. No. S-10-193 EJG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Mortenson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ERIC MORTENSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 24, 2011

Citations

Cr. No. S-10-193 EJG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2011)