Opinion
18-35931
02-01-2024
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
Argued and Submitted December 6, 2022
Submission Withdrawn December 12, 2022
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding D.C. Nos. 1:16-cv-00099-SPW 1:04-cr-00126-SPW-1
Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM [*]
Orville Morrison appeals from the district court's order denying his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
In 2004, Morrison shot and killed William Wick. Following a jury trial, Morrison was convicted of voluntary manslaughter, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1112(a), and of using a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). In 2016, Morrison filed a section 2255 motion seeking relief on the theory that voluntary manslaughter does not constitute a crime of violence under section 924(c). The district court denied relief, concluding that the motion was untimely. "We review de novo the district court's denial of a § 2255 motion." United States v. Fultz, 923 F.3d 1192, 1194 (9th Cir. 2019).
On appeal, the United States expressly waived any argument that Morrison's motion was untimely, instead arguing that his claim fails on the merits. After hearing oral argument, we withdrew submission pending the issuance of the mandate in United States v. Draper, 84 F.4th 797 (9th Cir. 2023). The mandate has now issued. In Draper, the court held that voluntary manslaughter under section 1112(a) is a crime of violence under section 924(c). Id. at 807. That holding resolves this case. Because voluntary manslaughter is a crime of violence, the district court did not err in denying Morrison's section 2255 motion.
AFFIRMED.
[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.