From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Morrison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Jan 6, 2021
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 2:18-cr-00142 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 6, 2021)

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 2:18-cr-00142

01-06-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSHUA I. MORRISON, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Pending before the court is Defendant Joshua Morrison's Motion for Compassionate Release and to Appoint Counsel. [ECF No. 43]. The court, in deciding such motions, will consider the following: whether the defendant has exhausted his administrative remedies, has demonstrated "extraordinary and compelling reasons," is not a danger to the safety of others, and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. In deciding what constitutes "extraordinary and compelling reasons" for release by reason of COVID-19, this court has held a defendant must demonstrate that he has a medical condition listed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as causing an increased risk of severe illness from COVID-19 and that he is at a facility which cannot effectively prevent the spread of the virus. Given this standard, the court finds it appropriate to resolve this Motion without further briefing or filings. For the reasons that follow, the Motion is DENIED without prejudice.

I. Background

On November 15, 2018, I sentenced Mr. Morrison to 37 months of imprisonment followed by ten years of supervised release following his conviction for the sexual abuse of a minor. [ECF No. 36]. Mr. Morrison is currently incarcerated at Low Security Federal Correctional Institution Butner ("FCI Butner Low") with a projected release date of July 24, 2021. Find an Inmate, Fed. Bureau of Prisons, https://www.bop.gov/inmateloc (last visited January 6, 2021).

Mr. Morrison now petitions the court, arguing that the combination of his health issues and the COVID-19 pandemic constitute "extraordinary and compelling reasons" for his release. [ECF No. 43, at 1]. According to Mr. Morrison, he suffers from sleep apnea and has a heart arrhythmia. [ECF No. 43, at 5]

II. Discussion

The First Step Act "embodies Congress's intent to reduce the Bureau of Prison's ["BOP"] authority over compassionate release petitions and authorizes the district courts to exercise their independent discretion to determine whether there are 'extraordinary and compelling reasons' to reduce a sentence." United States v. Galloway, No. CR RDB-10-0775, 2020 WL 2571172, at *3 (D. Md. May 21, 2020) (internal citations removed); see also United States v. Stephenson, No. 3:05-CR-00511, 2020 WL 2566760, at *5 (S.D. Iowa May 21, 2020) ("Unqualified deference to the BOP no longer makes sense now that the First Step Act has reduced the BOP's role.").

For me to reduce Mr. Morrison's sentence under compassionate release, I must find that Mr. Morrison has exhausted his administrative remedies and has demonstrated "extraordinary and compelling reasons," and find that his release is consistent with § 3553(a) factors. See e.g., United States v. Howard, No. 4:15-CR-00018-BR, 2020 WL 2200855, at *2 (E.D.N.C. May 6, 2020); U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13 (2018). As I will explain, to find "extraordinary and compelling reasons" exist by reason of COVID-19, Mr. Morrison must demonstrate that he has a medical condition listed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ("CDC") as causing an increased risk of severe illness from COVID-19 and that he is at a facility which cannot effectively prevent the spread of the virus.

Mr. Morrison has not satisfied all of those requirements, and I do not reduce his sentence today.

a) Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies and Section 3582(c)(1)(A)

The First Step Act empowers criminal defendants to request compassionate release for "extraordinary and compelling reasons." 18 U.S.C § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). But before they make such requests, defendants must ask BOP to do so on their behalf and then wait 30 days. See § 3582(c)(1)(A). Upon such a motion from BOP or from a defendant (after BOP denies the request or thirty days have elapsed since the request was filed), a court "may reduce the term of imprisonment . . . ." 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i); see also United States v. McCoy, --- F.3d ---, 2020 WL 7050097, at *8 (4th Cir. Dec. 2, 2020).

Mr. Morrison attached documentation to his Motion which shows that he requested compassionate release from the warden at FCI Butner Low on June 29, 2020. [ECF No. 43, at 8]. Mr. Morrison's request was denied by the warden on July 13, 2020. [ECF No. 43, at 8]. Because more than thirty days have passed since Mr. Morrison sent his initial request to the warden, I find that Mr. Morrison has exhausted his administrative remedies. As such, I now turn to whether Mr. Morrison has alleged extraordinary and compelling reasons that would justify compassionate release.

b) Extraordinary and compelling reasons for release

Once an inmate has satisfied administrative exhaustion, a court may reduce his sentence upon a finding of "extraordinary and compelling reasons." See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A).

There are "disagreements [among district courts] about the precise definition of 'extraordinary and compelling reasons' justifying compassionate release." United States v. Cotinola, No. 13-CR-03890-MV, 2020 WL 2526717, at *3 (D.N.M. May 18, 2020). But the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has clarified that district courts are not bound by the enumerated extraordinary and compelling reasons listed in Guidelines § 1B1.13 because the Guidelines have not been updated since the passage of the First Step Act. United States v. McCoy, --- F.3d ---, 2020 WL 7050097, at *8 (4th Cir. Dec. 2, 2020) ("As of now, there is no Sentencing Commission policy statement 'applicable' to the defendants' compassionate-release motions, which means the district court need not conform . . . to § 1B1.13 in determining whether there exist 'extraordinary and compelling reasons' for a sentence reduction."). "District Courts are 'empowered . . . to consider any extraordinary and compelling reason for release that a defendant might raise.'" McCoy, at *9 (quoting United States v. Zullo, 976 F.3d 228, 230 (2d Cir. 2020)).

The specific extraordinary and compelling reasons listed in the Sentencing Guidelines for BOP to consider include i) the defendant is suffering from a terminal or serious medical condition; ii) age of defendant; iii) family circumstances of defendant; and iv) "other reasons." U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13; United States v. Bass, No. 1:10-CR-166 (LEK), 2020 WL 2831851, at *3-4 (N.D.N.Y. May 27, 2020). "Following the passage of the First Step Act, courts may independently determine whether such 'other reasons' are present in a given case, without deference to the determination made by the BOP." United States of America v. Thaher, No. 17 CR. 302-3 (KPF), 2020 WL 3051334, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. June 8, 2020). --------

Many courts have found "extraordinary and compelling" reasons "supporting release on the basis of a combination of dire prison conditions and underlying health conditions that increase the likelihood of severe illness from COVID-19." See e.g., Bass, 2020 WL 2831851, at *7 (citing e.g., Rodriguez, 2020 WL 1627331, at *9 (finding an "extraordinary and compelling reason" on the basis of the inmate's diabetes, high blood pressure, and liver abnormalities, the outbreak at FCI Elkton, and the short period remaining on his sentence); United States v. Sawicz, No. 08-CR-287 (ARR), 2020 WL 1815851, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 10, 2020) (finding an "extraordinary and compelling reason" on the basis of the inmate's hypertension and conditions at FCI Danbury). I previously granted compassionate release to a defendant who was immunocompromised—suffering from a liver disease, Hepatitis C. See United States v. White, No. 2:17-CR-00198-4, 2020 WL 3244122, at *6 (S.D. W. Va. June 12, 2020); see also Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): People with Certain Medical Conditions, CDC, https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra- precautions/people-with-medical-conditions.html (last visited Sept. 20, 2020) (listing "immunocompromised state" as an underlying medical condition causing an "increased risk for severe illness from COVID-19").

In addition, many courts rely upon CDC guidance for whether a medical condition constitutes an "extraordinary and compelling" reason for release. See e.g., United States v. Salvagno, No. 5:02-CR-51 (LEK), 2020 WL 3410601, at *4 (N.D.N.Y. Apr. 23, 2020), reconsideration denied (June 22, 2020) ("The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has advised that people with hypertension face an increased risk of severe illness from COVID-19."); United States v. Nygren, No. 1:16-CR-00106-JAW, 2020 WL 4208926, at *12 (D. Me. July 22, 2020) ("Based on the medical records in this case and the CDC guidance . . . ."); United States v. Bell, No. 18-CR-60115-BB-4, 2020 WL 4217724, at *4 (S.D. Fla. July 23, 2020) ("CDC guidance indicates that individuals with the following health conditions are at a higher risk of contracting severe illness due to COVID-19 . . . ."). And many courts reject compassionate release petitions when the defendant does not suffer from any conditions recognized by CDC as causing an increased risk of severe illness from COVID-19. See e.g., United States v. Adeyemi, No. CR 06-124, 2020 WL 3642478, at *19 (E.D. Pa. July 6, 2020) ("Mr. Adeyemi's asthma does not currently fit the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's high-risk category."); United States v. Mollica, No. 2:14-CR-329-KOB, 2020 WL 2811504, at *3 (N.D. Ala. May 29, 2020) ("Ms. Mollica is under 65 and the CDC has not listed the underlying conditions from which she suffers as creating particular risk for COVID-19."); United States v. Arroyo, No. 2:19-CR-54-1-TLS-JPK, 2020 WL 3118787, at *4 (N.D. Ind. June 12, 2020) ("High cholesterol is not listed on the CDC website as a risk factor related to COVID-19 . . . ."); United States v. Cosby, No. 18CR4474-JAH, 2020 WL 3840567, at *4 (S.D. Cal. July 7, 2020) ("CDC has not listed epileptic seizures as a condition that places individuals at a higher risk of severe illness."); United States v. Frazer, No. CR 19-110, 2020 WL 2404893, at *2 (E.D. Pa. May 12, 2020) ("Sleep apnea is not listed by the CDC as a serious underlying medical condition that could increase a person's risk for severe illness from COVID-19.").

I join other courts in holding that I cannot find that "extraordinary and compelling" reasons exist to grant release because of COVID-19 unless the inmate has a condition that makes him or her more at risk for developing a serious illness from COVID-19 and the facility where the inmate is housed has conditions such that its inmates are at a high risk of contracting COVID-19. See United States v. Raia, 954 F.3d 594, 594 (3d Cir. 2020) ("But the mere existence of COVID-19 in society and the possibility that it may spread to a particular prison alone cannot independently justify compassionate release . . . ."); United States v. Penaloza, No. 19-238, 2020 WL 1555064, at *2 (D. Md. Apr. 1, 2020) ("[T]he mere presence of the virus, even in the detention setting, does not translate to the release of a person accused.").

In deciding which conditions result in an inmate being a higher risk for COVID-19, I will defer to CDC's list of medical conditions causing an increased risk of severe illness from COVID-19. See Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): People with Certain Medical Conditions, CDC, https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019- ncov/need-extra-precautions/people-with-medical-conditions.html (last visited January 6, 2021). Using CDC guidance will allow for more predictable standards in deciding which defendants have "extraordinary and compelling" reasons justifying release.

If an inmate can demonstrate that he or she has a condition identified by CDC, next, the defendant must show that his or her prison conditions are such that BOP cannot effectively prevent the spread of COVID-19. Factors include but are not limited to the steps BOP has taken to stop the spread of COVID-19 in that particular prison and steps to follow CDC guidance, the ability of inmates to socially distance, the amount of hygiene products and face masks provided to inmates, and the number of COVID-19 cases in that prison.

Here, Mr. Morrison has not presented sufficient evidence that he has a condition that makes him at risk for developing serious illness from COVID-19. The CDC does not list sleep apnea or a heart arrhythmia as underlying medical condition sthat presents an increased risk for a person of any age developing a severe illness from COVID-19. See Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): People with Certain Medical Conditions, CDC, https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/people-with-medical-conditions.html (last visited January 6, 2021).

Because Mr. Morrison has not been diagnosed with a qualifying underlying condition, I do not find extraordinary and compelling reasons justifying his release. Therefore, I need not determine whether the conditions at FCI Butner Low are such that BOP cannot effectively prevent the spread of COVID-19 or whether the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors support a reduced sentence in this case.

III. Conclusion

The court DENIES without prejudice Mr. Morrison's Motion for Compassionate Release and to Appoint Counsel. [ECF No. 43]. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the defendant and counsel, the United States Attorney, the United States Probation Office, and the United States Marshal.

ENTER: January 6, 2021

/s/_________

JOSEPH R. GOODWIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Morrison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Jan 6, 2021
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 2:18-cr-00142 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 6, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Morrison

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSHUA I. MORRISON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Jan 6, 2021

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 2:18-cr-00142 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 6, 2021)