From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Morris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 23, 2012
Criminal Case No. 10-cr-00317-REB-01 (D. Colo. Apr. 23, 2012)

Opinion

Criminal Case No. 10-cr-00317-REB-01

04-23-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 1. CURTIS L. MORRIS, Defendant.


Judge Robert E. Blackburn


ORDER STRIKING UNAUTHORIZED PRO SE NOTICE

Blackburn, J.

The matter is before me sua sponte concerning the latest in an unmitigated series of unauthorized notices docketed as [#469] and [#470] filed pro se by defendant, Curtis L. Morris, on April 9, 2012. Consistent with my orders entered beginning August 23, 2011, I strike these latest unauthorized and contumacious notices.

"[#469]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.

These notices are neither required by law nor authorized by this court. As I held in a series of orders, the latest of which [#435] was entered on March 21, 2012, when a defendant is represented by counsel, as Mr. Morris is, this court will not accept pro se filings from that defendant. Such pro se filings are improper, whether in the form of a notice, a motion, or otherwise. See United States v. Nichols, 374 F.3d 959, 964 n.2 (10th Cir. 2004) (citing United States v. Guadalupe, 979 F.2d 790, 795 (10th Cir. 1992)), reviewed on other grounds, 125 S.Ct. 1082 (2005).

Accordingly, the filing of these latest, two, unauthorized notices appear to constitute flagrant violations of my extant orders. In turn, the filing of these latest unauthorized notices in ostensible violation of my orders constitutes a series of additional and continuing contempts of court. Thus, at my earliest convenience I will issue yet another order to show cause requiring Mr. Morris to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of this court and punished accordingly for the filing of these latest unauthorized papers.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the unauthorized NOTICE Notice of Amended Filing Authenticated Foreign Judgment Record And Notice of Filing Original Certificate of Authentication of Notary [#469] filed pro se by defendant, Curtis L. Morris, on April 9, 2012, is STRICKEN;

2. That the unauthorized NOTICE Notice of Amended Filing Authenticated Foreign Judgment Record And Notice of Filing Original Certificate of Authentication of Notary [#470] filed pro se by defendant, Curtis L. Morris, on April 9, 2012, is STRICKEN; and

3. That subject to the penalties for contempt of court, as long as the defendant, Curtis L. Morris, is represented in this action by an attorney, he is ENJOINED and RESTRAINED from filing or attempting to file papers in any form in this action without the advance permission of this court.

Dated April 23, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

_________________

Robert E. Blackburn

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Morris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 23, 2012
Criminal Case No. 10-cr-00317-REB-01 (D. Colo. Apr. 23, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Morris

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 1. CURTIS L. MORRIS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 23, 2012

Citations

Criminal Case No. 10-cr-00317-REB-01 (D. Colo. Apr. 23, 2012)