From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Morris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 6, 2012
Criminal Action No. 10-cr-00317-REB (D. Colo. Apr. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Criminal Action No. 10-cr-00317-REB

04-06-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 1. CURTIS L. MORRIS, 2. RICHARD KELLOGG ARMSTRONG, Defendants.


Judge Robert E. Blackburn


Deputy Clerk: Emily Seamon

Court Reporter: Tracy Weir

Parties: Counsel:

Kenneth Harmon

Kevin Sweeney

Lisa Wayne

Pro Se, with David Owen, Advisory

Counsel

COURTROOM MINUTES

Trial Preparation Conference

1:35 p.m. Court in session.

Defendants are present in custody.

Also seated at government's table are Greg Flynn and Wayne Stockley, IRS Special Agents.

Also seated at defense table is Wendy Anderson, CJA paralegal for Ms. Wayne.

Discussion between Court and counsel regarding Defendant Morris' Motion for Hearing to Determine Mental Competency Prior to Trial.

1:38 p.m. Argument presented by Ms. Wayne.

1:50 p.m. Response by Mr. Harmon.

2:03 p.m. Rebuttal by Ms. Wayne.

ORDERED: Defendant Morris' Motion for Hearing to Determine Mental Competency Prior to Trial [Doc. No. 450, Filed April 3, 2012] is DENIED insofar as the request of the Court to hold a formal competency hearing and insofar as the Court order a competency evaluation. For now, Defendant Curtis L. Morris, is presumed and declared to be competent to proceed.

Discussion regarding length of trial, proposed jury instructions, verdict forms, proposed voir dire examination questions, operating with 12 regular jurors and 2 alternates, the alternate juror seat positions, a juror questionnaire, the individuals who will be seated at counsel table, entering and exiting the courtroom during the trial, Defendants dressing in civilian clothing, attorney conducted voir dire, length of opening statements, the Court issuing an Order of Sequestration under Federal Rules of Evidence 615, minimizing bench conferences, and closing arguments.

Mr. Harmon addresses the Court regarding the matter of forfeiture and accommodating witnesses.

Ms. Wayne addresses the Court regarding the number of peremptory challenges, attorney conducted voir dire, and an objection to the headings of proposed examination questions submitted by the Government.

ORDERED: Defendants are remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal.

2:55 p.m. Court in recess.

Total time in court: 1:20

Hearing concluded.


Summaries of

United States v. Morris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 6, 2012
Criminal Action No. 10-cr-00317-REB (D. Colo. Apr. 6, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Morris

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 1. CURTIS L. MORRIS, 2. RICHARD…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 6, 2012

Citations

Criminal Action No. 10-cr-00317-REB (D. Colo. Apr. 6, 2012)