From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Morris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 12, 2012
Cr.S. 11-509-KJM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2012)

Opinion

Cr.S. 11-509-KJM

01-12-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KRISTINA M. MORRIS, Defendant.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender DENNIS S. WAKS, BAR #142581 Supervising Assistant Federal Defender


DANIEL J. BRODERICK
Federal Defender
DENNIS S. WAKS, BAR #142581
Supervising Assistant Federal Defender

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PRELIMINARY

HEARING AND EXCLUDE TIME


Judge: Kendall J. Newman

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its attorney of record, Assistant United States Attorney, MICHELLE RODRIGUEZ, and Defendant KRISTINA M. MORRIS, individually and by her counsel of record, DENNIS S. WAKS, Supervising Assistant Federal Defender hereby stipulate to continue the Preliminary Hearing set for January 23, 2012, to February 13, 2012, at 2:00 p.m.

The parties agree that the time beginning from the date of this stipulation extending through February 6, 2012, should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. Further, the Defendant consents to an extension of the time for a Preliminary Hearing until February 13, 2012, Fed. R. Crim. P. 5.1(d). The parties submit that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that they may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). In particular, the time is required so that the parties can continue to discuss a proposed disposition and conduct investigation. The parties stipulate that this interest of justice outweighs the interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(b) and (h)(7)(A), and further that this good cause outweighs the public's interest in the prompt disposition of criminal cases. Fed. R. Crim. P. 5.1(d).

The parties further request that this matter be taken off calendar on January 23, 2012, or such time as either party may request a hearing for a purpose other than Preliminary Hearing.

Lastly, the defendant anticipates that she will enter a plea of guilty to the Information filed before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on February 13, 2012, at 8:30 a.m.

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL BRODERICK

Federal Defender

___________

DENNIS S. WAKS

Supervising Assistant Federal

Defender

Attorney for Defendant

KRISTINA M. MORRIS

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

___________

MICHELLE RODRIGUEZ

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

The Court has read and considered the Stipulation for Extension of Time for Preliminary Hearing pursuant to Rule 5.1(d) and Exclusion of Time, filed by the parties in this matter on January 11, 2012. The Court hereby finds that the Stipulation, which this Court incorporates by reference into this Order, demonstrates good cause for an extension of time for the Preliminary Hearing date pursuant to Rule 5.1(d) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Furthermore, for the reasons set forth in the parties' stipulation, the Court finds that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C.§3161(h)(7)(A). The Court further finds that the extension of time would not adversely effect the public interest in the prompt disposition of criminal cases.

THEREFORE, FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN:

1. The date of the Preliminary Hearing is extended to February 13, 2012, at 2:00 p.m..

2. This time between January 23, 2012, and February 13, 2012, shall be excluded from calculation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1(d).

3. The defendant shall appear at the date and time before the duty Magistrate Judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Morris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 12, 2012
Cr.S. 11-509-KJM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Morris

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KRISTINA M. MORRIS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 12, 2012

Citations

Cr.S. 11-509-KJM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2012)