From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Morgan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
Jun 6, 2013
Case No. 1:00-CR-18 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 6, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:00-CR-18

06-06-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NANCY LYNN MORGAN


JUDGE COLLIER


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

The defendant appeared for a hearing before the undersigned on June 6, 2013, in accordance with Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on the Petition for Warrant for Offender Under Supervision (Petition) of U.S. Probation Officer Sladjauna D. Hays and the Warrant for Arrest issued by U.S. District Judge Curtis L. Collier. Those present for the hearing included:

(1) AUSA Chris Poole for the USA.
(2) The defendant NANCY LYNN MORGAN.
(3) Attorney Myrlene Marsa for defendant.
(4) Deputy Clerk Kelli Jones.

After being sworn in due form of law the defendant was informed or reminded of her privilege against self-incrimination accorded her under the 5th Amendment to the United States Constitution.

It was determined the defendant wished to be represented by an attorney and she qualified for the appointment of an attorney to represent her at government expense. Federal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee, Inc. was APPOINTED to represent the defendant. It was determined the defendant had been provided with a copy of the Petition and the Warrant for Arrest and had the opportunity of reviewing those documents with her attorney. It was also determined the defendant was capable of being able to read and understand the copy of the aforesaid documents she had been provided.

Defendant waived her right to a preliminary hearing but asked for a detention/bond hearing.

AUSA Poole called USPO Sladjauna D. Hays as a witness and moved that the defendant be detained pending the revocation hearing.

Findings


(1) Based upon USPO Hays' testimony and the waiver, the undersigned finds
there is probable cause to believe defendant has committed violations of her conditions of supervised release as alleged or set forth in the Petition.
(2) The defendant has not carried her burden under Rule 32.1(a)(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, that if released on bail she will not flee or will not pose a danger to the community.

Conclusions

It is ORDERED:

(1) The motion of AUSA Poole that the defendant be DETAINED WITHOUT BAIL pending the revocation hearing before U.S. District Judge Curtis L. Collier is GRANTED.
(2) The U.S. Marshal shall transport defendant to a revocation hearing before Judge Collier on Thursday, June 20, 2013, at 9:00 a.m.

ENTER.

____________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Morgan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
Jun 6, 2013
Case No. 1:00-CR-18 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 6, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Morgan

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NANCY LYNN MORGAN

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

Date published: Jun 6, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:00-CR-18 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 6, 2013)