From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Moreno

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 5, 2012
No. 1:08-cr-00397 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)

Opinion

No. 1:08-cr-00397 AWI

01-05-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. EVODIO MORENO, Defendant.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender MARC DAYS, Bar #184098 Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant EVODIO MORENO


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

MARC DAYS, Bar #184098

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

EVODIO MORENO

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE HEARING; ORDER


Date : February 6, 2012

Judge: Hon. Anthony W. Ishii

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, and through their respective attorneys of record herein, that the status conference hearing in the above captioned matter now set for January 9, 2012, may be continued to February 6, 2012, at 9:00 a.m.

This continuance is requested by counsel for the defendant because the parties anticipate a resolution of the matter and need additional time for plea negotiations. The requested continuance will conserve time and resources for both counsel and the court. Assistant United States Attorney Mark McKeon has no objection to this request.

The parties agree that time shall be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B) in that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, including, but not limited to, the need for the period of time set forth herein for effective defense preparation and continuing plea negotiation purposes.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

___________________________

MARK McKEON

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

___________________________

MARC DAYS

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

EVODIO MORENO

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. For the reasons set forth above, the continuance requested is granted for good cause. The Court finds that the interest of justice outweighs the interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial, and time is excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________________________

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Moreno

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 5, 2012
No. 1:08-cr-00397 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Moreno

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. EVODIO MORENO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 5, 2012

Citations

No. 1:08-cr-00397 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)