From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Moreno

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Jun 20, 2014
CR 12-750 LHK (N.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2014)

Opinion

          JAY R. WEILL, ANDREW R. J. MUIR, SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP, San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Defendant FIDENCIO MORENO.

          Leland B. Altschuler, LAW OFFICE OF LELAND B. ALTSCHULER, Attorneys for Defendant Arturo Moreno.

          Nanci L. Clarence, CLARENCE DYER & COHEN LLP, Attorneys for Defendant Elena Moreno.


          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING RE: CHANGE OF PLEA

          LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.

         The parties hereby stipulate and request that the change of plea and/or trial setting hearing currently set for June 24, 2014, be continued so that the parties may further explore resolution of the case. We had hoped that plea negotiations could be concluded by June 24, 2014 but that does not seem realistic. The parties agree and stipulate that the hearing be continued to July 30, 2014.

         IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that time under the Speedy Trial Act be excluded from June 24, 2014, until July 30, 2014, because the ends of the justice outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, for effective preparation of defense counsel, and taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

          ORDER

         Pursuant to stipulation, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the hearing set for June 24, 2014 be continued to July 30, 2014.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.

         DENIED.

         Time of plea negotiations is not a basis to exclude Speedy Trial time. Please submit a new Stipulation.


Summaries of

United States v. Moreno

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Jun 20, 2014
CR 12-750 LHK (N.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Moreno

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FIDENCIO MORENO, ARTURO MORENO…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Jun 20, 2014

Citations

CR 12-750 LHK (N.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2014)