From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Moreno

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 17, 2006
171 F. App'x 595 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted March 8, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

John J. Kirby, Jr., Esq., Joseph S. Smith, Jr., USSD--Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff--Appellee.

Robert A. Garcia, Esq., San Diego, CA, for Defendant--Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Jeffrey T. Miller, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-03-00060-JM.

Before: CANBY, BEEZER, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Orlando Moreno appeals from the 108-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction to conspiracy to possess and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute on board a vessel, in violation of 46 U.S.C. § 1903(a)(j). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We remand to the sentencing court for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir.2005).

REMANDED.


Summaries of

United States v. Moreno

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 17, 2006
171 F. App'x 595 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Moreno

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Orlando MORENO…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 17, 2006

Citations

171 F. App'x 595 (9th Cir. 2006)