From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Morales

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION
Nov 18, 2020
4:18-CR-00199-01 SWW (E.D. Ark. Nov. 18, 2020)

Opinion

4:18-CR-00199-01 SWW

11-18-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JORGE LUIS MORALES


ORDER

For the reasons set out below, Defendant's Motion for Compassionate Release (Doc. No. 18) is DENIED.

I. BACKGROUND

On June 26, 2018, Defendant pled guilty to illegal reentry after deportation. On September 11, 2018, he was sentenced to 57 months in prison.

Doc. No. 13.

Doc. Nos. 15, 16.

II. DISCUSSION

Although the First Step Act made the procedural hurdles for compassionate release a bit less strenuous, a defendant still must establish "extraordinary and compelling reasons" and that release would not be contrary to the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors.

18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2) mandates that any sentence imposed reflect the seriousness of the offense, afford adequate deterrence, protect the public, and provide the defendant with appropriate rehabilitation.

Before a Defendant may seek compassionate release under the First Step Act, he must first make the request with the Bureau of Prisons and exhaust his administrative remedies there. Defendant's motion indicates that he has not requested compassionate release from the warden. Accordingly, this Court is without jurisdiction.

See United States v. Smith, Case No. 4:95-CR-00019-LPR-4, Doc. No. 440 (E.D. Ark. May 14, 2020) (no jurisdiction when defendant fails to exhaust administrative remedies).

Even if this Court had jurisdiction, the request would be denied. In support of his request for compassionate release, Defendant asserts that his parents have several health conditions and that he needs to support his kids "financially and morally." Under the Guidelines, compassionate release may be warranted upon the "death or incapacitation of the caregiver of the defendant's minor child." Defendant has provided neither evidence nor argument to support a finding that his parents and children do not have caretakers. He alleges only that he needs to help them financially, which is an insufficient reason to grant compassionate release.

Doc. No. 18, at 5.

U.S.S.G § 1B1.13 cmt. n. 1(3) the defendant's family circumstances include either "(i) The death or incapacitation of the caregiver of the defendant's minor child or minor children" or "(ii) The incapacitation of the defendant's spouse or registered partner when the defendant would be the only available caregiver for the spouse or registered partner." --------

Even if Defendant could establish extraordinary and compelling reasons, his request for relief must be denied because of the § 3553(a) factors - specifically, protecting the public from additional crimes by Defendant and reflecting the severity of the offense. Defendant has six prior convictions. They include DWI, robbery, burglary, drug possession, throwing a missile (piece of concrete) into a dwelling, and illegal reentry. In fact, this is the third time he was found illegally in the United States.

CONCLUSION

Based on the above, the Motion for Compassionate Release (Doc. No. 18) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 18th day of November, 2020.

Susan Webber Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Morales

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION
Nov 18, 2020
4:18-CR-00199-01 SWW (E.D. Ark. Nov. 18, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Morales

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JORGE LUIS MORALES

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION

Date published: Nov 18, 2020

Citations

4:18-CR-00199-01 SWW (E.D. Ark. Nov. 18, 2020)

Citing Cases

United States v. Payne

Plainly, financial needs are an insufficient reason to grant compassionate release. See United States …

United States v. Harden

Nevertheless, because mandatory claimprocessing rules are non-jurisdictional, seeFort Bend Cnty., Texas v.…