From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Moore

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Feb 2, 2024
4:15-CR-00273-01-LPR (E.D. Ark. Feb. 2, 2024)

Opinion

4:15-CR-00273-01-LPR

02-02-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. KOREY K. MOORE DEFENDANT


ORDER

LEE P RUDOFSKY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Defendant's Motion to Reduce Sentence (Doc. 149) is DENIED.

Defendant seeks a sentence reduction based on guideline Amendment 821's retroactive changes to “status points.” Although Defendant received status points, he was sentenced as an armed career criminal, which means his criminal history score remains VI and his guideline range is unchanged.

See U.S.S.G 1.10 (a)(2) (“Exclusions.-A reduction in the defendant's term of imprisonment is not consistent with this policy statement and therefore is not authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) if- . . . an amendment listed in subsection (d) does not have the effect of lowering the defendant's applicable guideline range.”).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Moore

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Feb 2, 2024
4:15-CR-00273-01-LPR (E.D. Ark. Feb. 2, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. KOREY K. MOORE DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Feb 2, 2024

Citations

4:15-CR-00273-01-LPR (E.D. Ark. Feb. 2, 2024)