Opinion
21-7379
06-03-2022
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AQUABEUS MOORE, Defendant-Appellant.
Aquabeus Moore, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: April 28, 2022
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:15-cr-00386-RMG-2)
Aquabeus Moore, Appellant Pro Se.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Aquabeus Moore appeals the district court's order denying his motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have reviewed the record on appeal and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Moore's motion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (providing standard), cert. denied, 142 S.Ct. 383 (2021). Accordingly, we deny Moore's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Moore, No. 2:15-cr-00386-RMG-2 (D.S.C. Sept. 13, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.