From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Montoya

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
Jun 23, 2017
No. 2:11 CR 21 (N.D. Ind. Jun. 23, 2017)

Opinion

No. 2:11 CR 21

06-23-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSE MONTOYA


OPINION and ORDER

Defendant Jose Montoya has moved to reduce the amount of restitution he is required to pay from $20,000 to $2,000, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3664(k). (DE # 138.) However, this statute provides:

Montoya states that this court ordered him to pay restitution in the amount of $120,000 (DE # 138 at 1), but this is not the case (see Judgment, DE # 133 at 6). --------

[T]he defendant shall notify the court and the Attorney General of any material change in the defendant's economic circumstances that might affect the defendant's ability to pay restitution... . Upon receipt of the notification, the court may, on its own motion, or the motion of any party, including the victim, adjust the payment schedule, or require immediate payment in full, as the interests of justice require.
18 U.S.C. § 3664(k). In short, Section 3664(k) allows for acceleration of payment or adjustment of the payment schedule, not reduction of the total of amount of restitution. Accordingly, Section 3664(k) provides no basis upon which the court may grant defendant's request. Defendant's motion is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

Date: June 23, 2017

s/James T. Moody

JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Montoya

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
Jun 23, 2017
No. 2:11 CR 21 (N.D. Ind. Jun. 23, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Montoya

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSE MONTOYA

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

Date published: Jun 23, 2017

Citations

No. 2:11 CR 21 (N.D. Ind. Jun. 23, 2017)