From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Montenegro-Barrera

United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana
Jun 21, 2024
2:23-CR-089 GSL (N.D. Ind. Jun. 21, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-CR-089 GSL

06-21-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BRISEIDA MONTENEGRO-BARRERA


ORDER

GRETCHEN S. LUND, JUDGE

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge's findings and recommendation upon a plea of guilty issued on June 6, 2024 [DE 40]. Accordingly, the Court now ADOPTS those findings and recommendations, ACCEPTS defendant Brisedia Montenegro-Barrera's plea of guilty, ACCEPTS the plea agreement, and FINDS the defendant guilty of Count 1 of the Indictment, for violating 21 U.S.C. § 846.

Any objections a party submits to the probation officer in response to the draft Presentence Report must specifically identify the basis of the objection and any supporting authority. Should the Addendum to the Final Presentence Report reflect any outstanding objections by a party, that party must specifically state in its sentencing memorandum whether it maintains that objection. If so, the party must identify the basis and authority for its objection and, where applicable, any evidence the party expects to offer in support of that objection. The party should also state if, consistent with Rule 32(i)(3)(B), it does not believe a ruling on that objection will be necessary.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Montenegro-Barrera

United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana
Jun 21, 2024
2:23-CR-089 GSL (N.D. Ind. Jun. 21, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Montenegro-Barrera

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BRISEIDA MONTENEGRO-BARRERA

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana

Date published: Jun 21, 2024

Citations

2:23-CR-089 GSL (N.D. Ind. Jun. 21, 2024)