From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Montanez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2011
Cr.S.11-231-MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)

Opinion

Cr.S.11-231-MCE

09-20-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE MONTANEZ, Defendant.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender MATTHEW M. SCOBLE Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant JOSE MONTANEZ BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney TODD LERAS Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bart# 89424

Federal Defender

MATTHEW M. SCOBLE, Bart# 237432

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

JOSE MONTANEZ

STIPULATION AND ORDER

TIME: 9:00 a.m.

JUDGE: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through TODD LERAS, Assistant U.S. Attorney, defendant, JOSE MONTANEZ, by and through his counsel, MATTHEW M. SCOBLE, Assistant Federal Defender, that the status conference set for Thursday, September 22, 2011, be continued to Thursday, November 3, 2011, at 9:00 a.m..

The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendant, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case.

Speedy trial time is to be excluded from the date of this order through the date of the status conference set for November 3, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] (Local Code T4).

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

MATTHEW M. SCOBLE

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

JOSE MONTANEZ

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

TODD LERAS

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Based on these findings and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the Court hereby adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. Time is excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced beginning from the date of the stipulation, September 19, 2011, through and including November 3, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare] and Local Code T4. A new status conference date is hereby set for November 3, 2011, at 9:00 a.m..

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Montanez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2011
Cr.S.11-231-MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Montanez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE MONTANEZ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 20, 2011

Citations

Cr.S.11-231-MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)