United States v. Monaco

31 Citing cases

  1. United States v. Johnson

    2:03-cr-31-JES-KCD (M.D. Fla. Sep. 18, 2024)   Cited 1 times

    If there are such “extraordinary and compelling reasons” for compassionate release, the district court has the discretion to reduce the defendant's term of imprisonment after considering the applicable Section 3553(a) factors. United States v. Monaco, 832 Fed.Appx. 626, 629 (11th Cir. 2020).

  2. United States v. Smith

    2:06-cr-42-JES-KCD (M.D. Fla. Aug. 9, 2024)   Cited 1 times

    If there are such “extraordinary and compelling reasons” for compassionate release, the district court has the discretion to reduce the defendant's term of imprisonment after considering the applicable Section 3553(a) factors. United States v. Monaco, 832 Fed.Appx. 626, 629 (11th Cir. 2020).

  3. Umited States v. Broomfield

    2:13-cr-55-JES-NPM (M.D. Fla. Jun. 13, 2024)

    If there are such “extraordinary and compelling reasons” for compassionate release, the district court has the discretion to reduce the defendant's term of imprisonment after considering the applicable Section 3553(a) factors. United States v. Monaco, 832 Fed.Appx. 626, 629 (11th Cir. 2020). “[I]f the district court finds that no extraordinary and compelling reason exists, then it cannot reduce the inmate's sentence-even if the § 3553(a) factors favor doing so.”.

  4. United States v. Taylor

    CRIMINAL 03-80029-CR-Scola (S.D. Fla. May. 13, 2024)

    Finally, the 3553(a) factors weigh in favor of a reduction of sentence. “Section 3553(a) requires the district court to consider (among other factors) the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant and the need for the sentence imposed to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, to provide just punishment for the offense, to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct, and to protect the public from further crimes of the defendant.” United States v. Monaco, 832 Fed.Appx. 626, 630 (11th Cir. 2020) (cleaned up). Mr. Taylor has already served over 20 years without credit for gain time and the equivalent of a 296-month (24 years and 7 months) sentence when accounting for gain time.

  5. United States v. Aird

    CRIMINAL 98-0057-WS (S.D. Ala. Apr. 23, 2024)

    The defendant must “actually experienc[e] a serious deterioration because of the aging process”; the deterioration cannot simply be inferred from the defendant's age. United States v. Monaco, 832 Fed.Appx. 626, 630 (11th Cir. 2020). The requirement of “serious deterioration” connotes deterioration “beyond what is normal to many individuals as part of the aging process.”

  6. United States v. Ductant

    2:11-cr-97-JES-NPM (M.D. Fla. Jul. 25, 2023)   Cited 1 times

    If there are such “extraordinary and compelling reasons” for compassionate release, the district court has the discretion to reduce the defendant's term of imprisonment after considering the applicable section 3553(a) factors. United States v. Monaco, 832 Fed.Appx. 626, 629 (11th Cir. 2020).

  7. United States v. Stevens

    Criminal Action 94-00002-KD (S.D. Ala. May. 3, 2023)   Cited 1 times

    And he must be presently experiencing the serious deterioration of his health. United States v. Monaco, 832 Fed.Appx. 626, 629-30 (11th Cir. 2020) (“ Monaco argues that the body and mind deteriorate over time - and indeed they do -but until he has actually experienced a ‘serious deterioration' because of the aging process, the policy statements do not support age alone as an extraordinary and compelling reason for compassionate release.”)

  8. United States v. Palacios-Bonilla

    8:08-cr-402-VMC-SPF (M.D. Fla. Mar. 15, 2023)

    But he provides no proof that he is experiencing a serious deterioration in physical or mental health because of the aging process, which precludes a finding of an extraordinary and compelling reason for release. See United States v. Monaco, 832 Fed.Appx. 626, 629-30 (11th Cir. 2020) (“In his compassionate release motion, Monaco requested a reduced sentence because of his age, the amount of time he had already served in prison, and his good behavior in prison.

  9. United States v. Paisley

    2:03-cr-74-JES-NPM (M.D. Fla. Oct. 4, 2022)

    If there are such “extraordinary and compelling reasons” for compassionate release, the district court has the discretion to reduce the defendant's term of imprisonment after considering the applicable section 3553(a) factors. United States v. Monaco, 832 Fed.Appx. 626, 629 (11th Cir. 2020).

  10. United States v. Chineag

    1:01-cr-00607-RAR/Becerra (S.D. Fla. Nov. 2, 2021)

    “But age, without more, is not enough.” United States v. Monaco, 832 Fed.Appx. 626, 629 (11th Cir. 2020). To be sure, Defendant has not demonstrated that the aging process has caused any serious deterioration in his physical or mental health, and “the policy statements do not support age alone as an extraordinary and compelling reason for compassionate release.