From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mitchell

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Apr 22, 2020
No. 19-13897 (11th Cir. Apr. 22, 2020)

Opinion

No. 19-13897

04-22-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANTONIO GABRIEL MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 5:17-cr-00117-RDP-SGC-1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, JORDAN, and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Perry Russell Steen, appointed counsel for Antonio Mitchell in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Mitchell's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Mitchell

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Apr 22, 2020
No. 19-13897 (11th Cir. Apr. 22, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANTONIO GABRIEL MITCHELL…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 22, 2020

Citations

No. 19-13897 (11th Cir. Apr. 22, 2020)