From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mitchell

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 19, 2024
4:18-CR-00674-02-JM (E.D. Ark. Mar. 19, 2024)

Opinion

4:18-CR-00674-02-JM

03-19-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KRISTOPHER MITCHELL


ORDER

Defendant's Motion to Reduce Sentence (Doc. No. 125) is DENIED because Amendment 821 does not lower his guideline range.

See U.S.S.G 1.10 (a)(2) (“Exclusions.-A reduction in the defendant's term of imprisonment is not consistent with this policy statement and therefore is not authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) if- . . . an amendment listed in subsection (d) does not have the effect of lowering the defendant's applicable guideline range.”).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Mitchell

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 19, 2024
4:18-CR-00674-02-JM (E.D. Ark. Mar. 19, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KRISTOPHER MITCHELL

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Mar 19, 2024

Citations

4:18-CR-00674-02-JM (E.D. Ark. Mar. 19, 2024)