Opinion
CASE NO.: 12cr1514 GT
07-06-2012
USA v. Mireles-Mendoza
NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES
To: [×] S. DISTRICT JUDGE / [ ] U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Thompson
FROM: SKHoestenbach,
Deputy Clerk
DOCUMENT FILED BY: Mireles-Mendoza
DOCUMENT ENTITLED: Letter
Upon the submission of the attached document(s). the following discrepancies are noted:
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦ Local Rule ¦ | Discrepancy ¦ +--+------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦[]¦5.1 ¦Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation ¦ +--+------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦[]¦5.3 ¦Document illegible or submitted on thermal facsimile paper ¦ +--+------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦[]¦5.4 ¦Document not filed electronically. Notice of Noncompliance already issued. ¦ +--+------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦[]¦7.1 or 47.1 ¦Date noticed for hearing not in compliance with rules/Document(s) are not ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦timely ¦ +--+------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦[]¦7.1 or 47.1 ¦Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦document ¦ +--+------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦[]¦7.1 or 47.1 ¦Briefs or memoranda exceed length restrictions ¦ +--+------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦[]¦7.1 ¦Missing table of contents ¦ +--+------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦[]¦15.1 ¦Amended pleading not complete in itself ¦ +--+------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦[]¦30.1 ¦Depositions not accepted absent a court order ¦ +--+------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦[]¦ ¦Supplemental documents require court order ¦ +--+------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦[]¦ ¦Default Judgment in sum certain includes calculated interest ¦ +--+------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦X ¦ ¦OTHER:L.R. 83.9. ex parte communication prohibited ¦ +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Date forwarded: 7/03/12
ORDER OF THE JUDGE / MAGISTRATE JUDGE
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
[√] The document is to be filed nune pro tune to date received.
[ ] The document is NOT to be filed, but instead REJECTED, and it is ORDERED that the Clerk serve a copy of this order on all parties.
Rejected document to be returned to pro se or inmate? [ ] Yes. Court Copy retained by chambers [√]
Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules may lead to penalties pursuant to Local Rule 83.1
CHAMBERS OF: __________________
By: __________________
Dated: July 5, 2012
cc: All Parties