From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Miranda-Cinto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 7, 2012
Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00368-REB (D. Colo. Sep. 7, 2012)

Opinion

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00368-REB

09-07-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 1. ARTURO MIRANDA-CINTO, Defendant.

Shana Martin La Fonda Traore


Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Courtroom Deputy: Nel Steffens
Court Reporter: Tracy Weir
Interpreter: Melinda Gonzalez-Hibner
Probation Officer: Sergio Garza

Parties:

Counsel:

Shana Martin

La Fonda Traore

SENTENCING MINUTES

3:23 p.m. Court in session.

Appearances of counsel. Defendant is present in custody. Interpreter is sworn; parties stipulate as to interpreter's qualifications. Court's opening remarks. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3552 and Fed.R.Crim.P. 32, the Probation Department has conducted a presentence investigation and has filed a presentence report and two addenda. Counsel for the government confirms that counsel has read the presentence report and addenda. Counsel for the defendant informs the court that counsel has read and discussed the presentence report and addenda with the defendant. Defendant's counsel makes a statement on behalf of the defendant, offers information in mitigation of punishment, comments on the probation officer's sentencing guideline applications and calculations, and comments on matters relating to the appropriate sentence. Defendant is sworn. Statement by the defendant. Statement by counsel for the government. The court makes a sentencing statement pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c) and enters findings of fact, conclusions of law, judgment of conviction, sentence, and orders.

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the plea agreement of the parties as presented in Court's Exhibits 1, 1a, 2, and 2a is formally approved;
2. That the Defendant's Motion for Downward Sentencing Variance [#39] filed August 21, 2012, is DENIED;
3. That judgment of conviction under Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(k) is entered on Count 1 of the Indictment;
4. That pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment and sentence of this court that the defendant is committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of forty-one (41) months;
5. That no term of supervised release is imposed, however, the defendant is advised that if he enters, remains, or is found in the United States illegally, or if he illegally possesses or uses a controlled substance, or if he possesses or uses a firearm, destructive device, or dangerous weapon as those terms are defined in our federal law at 19 U.S.C. § 921, he may be subject to further prosecution in federal court;
7. That no fine is imposed;
8. That the defendant shall pay forthwith a special victim's fund assessment fee of $100.00;
9. That the mandatory drug-testing provisions of 18 U.S.C.. § 3583(d) are waived;
10. That presentence confinement credit shall be determined by the Bureau of Prisons under 18 U.S.C. § 3585;
14. That the defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal.
Parties state they have no objections to the sentence imposed. The defendant is advised of the right to appeal the sentence imposed by the court.

3:53 p.m. Court in recess.

Total time in court: 00:30 Hearing concluded.


Summaries of

United States v. Miranda-Cinto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 7, 2012
Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00368-REB (D. Colo. Sep. 7, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Miranda-Cinto

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 1. ARTURO MIRANDA-CINTO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Sep 7, 2012

Citations

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00368-REB (D. Colo. Sep. 7, 2012)