Opinion
No. 14-10010
10-21-2015
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. IMRAN AHMED MIR, Defendant - Appellant.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
D.C. No. 2:12-cr-00141-JAM MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding
Before: SILVERMAN, BERZON, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Imran Ahmed Mir appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges the 108-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for distribution of cocaine, methamphetamine, and heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Mir contends that the district court erred by determining that sentencing entrapment is not a legal basis for an objection to a presentence report. The record belies Mir's contention that the court made this determination. Moreover, contrary to Mir's contention, the district court met its procedural obligations when it considered and rejected Mir's objections to the presentence report. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(i)(3)(B).
AFFIRMED.