Summary
considering appeal of denial of motion for new counsel
Summary of this case from Neighbors v. United StatesOpinion
No. 12-8003
05-06-2013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. EDWARD BLAINE MINTZ, a/k/a Edward Blain Mintz, Defendant - Appellant.
Edward Blaine Mintz, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:08-cr-00040-MR-1) Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward Blaine Mintz, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Edward Blaine Mintz appeals the district court's order denying his motion to appoint new counsel and for an extension of time to file a motion to reconsider the denial of his motion to reduce sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mintz, No. 1:08-cr-00040-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED