From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mink

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
May 28, 2024
2:21-cr-101-SPC-NPM (M.D. Fla. May. 28, 2024)

Opinion

2:21-cr-101-SPC-NPM

05-28-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MATTHEW MINK


ORDER

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court are Defendant Matthew Mink's Motion for Two-Level Downward Adjustment for “Zero Point” Offenders (Doc. 75), the Government's opposition (Doc. 80), and Defendant's reply (Doc. 82). Defendant is serving a 51-month sentence for four firearm offenses. Defendant argues, however, that he has the right to the zero-point offender adjustment to his sentence under U.S.S.G. § 4C1.1.

Defendant pleaded guilty to Count Four (possession of a firearm silencer not identified by a serial number), Count Six (possession of a machine gun), Count Seven (possession of an unregistered firearm silencer), and Count Eight (possession of a stolen firearm silencer) of the Indictment per a written plea agreement. Defendant's sentence of 51 months applies to each count but runs concurrently.

A defendant is entitled to the adjustment only if he meets every criterion in subsections (1) through (10). The parties square off over one criterion: “defendant did not possess, receive, purchase, transport, transfer, sell, or otherwise dispose of a firearm or other dangerous weapon (or induce another participant to do so) in connection with the offense.” § 4C1.1(a)(7). The problem for Defendant is that he pleaded guilty to and was adjudicated guilty of possessing a machine gun. Plus, the Offense Conduct section of the Presentence Investigation Report-to which Defendant did not object, says:

[Defendant] is responsible for possessing firearms that are in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5845(a) which consist of a Heckler & Koch 12-guage short-barreled shotgun, firearm silencers, and machineguns. He is accountable for possessing stolen firearms, stolen firearm silencers, unmarked firearm silencers, and a stolen firearm with an obliterated serial number. He is accountable for between 25 and 99 firearms, specifically about 50 firearms consisting of the following: 14 firearms and 2 firearm silencers seized from NGA by the ATF on December 7, 2020; 26 firearms and 2 firearm silencers stolen from NGA (which includes a recovered firearm silencer); and 3 firearms and 3 firearm silencers seized from the defendant's residence on October 25, 2021. [Defendant] also sold firearms unlawfully, manufactured firearms unlawfully, falsified documents, committed identity theft, and forged signatures.

(Doc. 49 at 12). So the record is clear that Defendant had a firearm in connection with the offense of which he was convicted. Defendant does not qualify for § 4C1.1's zero-point reduction. The Court thus denies the motion.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

Defendant Matthew Mink's Motion for Two-Level Downward Adjustment for “Zero Point” Offenders (Doc. 75) is DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Mink

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
May 28, 2024
2:21-cr-101-SPC-NPM (M.D. Fla. May. 28, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Mink

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MATTHEW MINK

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: May 28, 2024

Citations

2:21-cr-101-SPC-NPM (M.D. Fla. May. 28, 2024)