From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Millsap

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Nov 16, 2023
4:17-cr-00293-BSM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 16, 2023)

Opinion

4:17-cr-00293-BSM

11-16-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. MARCUS MILLSAP PLAINTIFF


ORDER

Marcus Millsap's motion to correct the judgment [Doc. No. 2810] is granted. The language “Credit for time served” in the judgment was intended to recommend that Millsap receive credit for all of the time he was incarcerated for the instant offense pretrial and post conviction until sentencing. Doc. No. 2772. Therefore, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36 permits this clarification. See United States v. Tramp, 30 F.3d 1035, 1037 (8th Cir. 1994). An amended judgment accompanies this order.

This ruling does not shorten Millsap's life sentence by recommending credit for his incarceration prior to sentencing. Duncan v. Alabama, 502 F.2d 571, 573 (5th Cir. 1974) (“The credit for time served by a life-termer will not shorten his life sentence”); see also Wilson v. North Carolina, 438 F.2d 284, 286 (4th Cir. 1971) (same).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Millsap

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Nov 16, 2023
4:17-cr-00293-BSM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 16, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Millsap

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. MARCUS MILLSAP PLAINTIFF

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Nov 16, 2023

Citations

4:17-cr-00293-BSM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 16, 2023)