From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mills

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Sep 20, 2021
CRIM. 21-730 (D.N.J. Sep. 20, 2021)

Opinion

CRIM. 21-730

09-20-2021

UNITED STATES v. MAURICE MILLS


ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELECONFERENCING FOR FELONY PLEAS AND/OR SENTENCINGS

HONORABLE BRIAN MARTINOTTI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

In accordance with Standing Order 2020-06, this Court finds:

[√] That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding(s) held today, after consultation with counsel; and
[√] That the proceeding(s) to be held today cannot be further delayed without serious harm to the interests of justice, for the following specific reasons:

Accordingly, the proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by:

[√] Video Teleconferencing
[ ] Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason:
[ ] The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video teleconferencing capability.
[ ] Other:


Summaries of

United States v. Mills

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Sep 20, 2021
CRIM. 21-730 (D.N.J. Sep. 20, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Mills

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES v. MAURICE MILLS

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Sep 20, 2021

Citations

CRIM. 21-730 (D.N.J. Sep. 20, 2021)