From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Miller

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Jan 15, 1991
923 F.2d 158 (11th Cir. 1991)

Opinion

No. 88-8714.

January 15, 1991.

William A. Morrison, Atlanta, Ga. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant.

Mary Jane Stewart, Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., Geoffrey Brigham, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Crim. Div. Appellate Section. Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia; Marvin H. Shoob, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion September 25, 1989, 11th Cir., 1989, 883 F.2d 1540)

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.


A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc.

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc without oral argument during the week of June 10, 1991. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.


Summaries of

United States v. Miller

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Jan 15, 1991
923 F.2d 158 (11th Cir. 1991)
Case details for

United States v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. LOUIS MILLER, JR.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Jan 15, 1991

Citations

923 F.2d 158 (11th Cir. 1991)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Miller

A panel of this court concluded that the district court committed reversible error by admitting extrinsic…

U.S. v. Lehder-Rivas

Mere corroboration of testimony, however, fails to justify the introduction of unrelated bad acts. United…