From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Milledge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA
Oct 1, 2018
Case No. 1:18-cr-00033-RP-CFB (S.D. Iowa Oct. 1, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 1:18-cr-00033-RP-CFB

10-01-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALEXANDER STERLING POTTER MILLEDGE, Defendant.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The United States of America and the Defendant, having both filed a written consent, appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed. R. Crim. P. and L. Cr. R. 11. The Defendant entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary as to each count, and that the offense charged is supported by an independent factual basis concerning each of the essential elements of such offense. Defendant understands and agrees to be bound by the terms of the Plea Agreement. I, therefore, recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, that a pre-sentence investigation and report be prepared, and that the Defendant be adjudged guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly. 10-1-18
Date

/s/_________

CELESTE F. BREMER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date of its service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States District Judge. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B).


Summaries of

United States v. Milledge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA
Oct 1, 2018
Case No. 1:18-cr-00033-RP-CFB (S.D. Iowa Oct. 1, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Milledge

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALEXANDER STERLING POTTER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA

Date published: Oct 1, 2018

Citations

Case No. 1:18-cr-00033-RP-CFB (S.D. Iowa Oct. 1, 2018)

Citing Cases

Hopkins v. AeroCare Home Med. Equip., Inc.

However, cases from within the Eighth Circuit that Plaintiffs cite as "applying" a multiplier did not. In…