From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Milke

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Dec 30, 2024
4:20-CR-00208-JM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 30, 2024)

Opinion

4:20-CR-00208-JM 4:24-CV-00945-JM

12-30-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TIM MILKE


ORDER

JAMES M. MOODY JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The standard for evaluating a certificate of appealability petition is set out in 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2): “A certificate of appealability may issue . . . only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” The Eighth Circuit has explained that “[a] substantial showing is a showing that issues are debatable among reasonable jurists, a court could resolve the issues differently, or the issues deserve further proceedings.”

Cox v. Norris, 133 F.3d 565, 569 (8th Cir. 1997).

Since Defendant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of any constitutional right, the Motion for Certificate of Appealability (Doc. No. 56) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

United States v. Milke

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Dec 30, 2024
4:20-CR-00208-JM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 30, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Milke

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TIM MILKE

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Dec 30, 2024

Citations

4:20-CR-00208-JM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 30, 2024)