From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Miles

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 25, 2024
4:18-CR-00466-BSM (E.D. Ark. Mar. 25, 2024)

Opinion

4:18-CR-00466-BSM

03-25-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. LEWIS MILES DEFENDANT


ORDER

Lewis Miles's pro se motion to reduce his sentence [Doc. No. 876] is denied because the retroactive application of Amendment 821 to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines does not apply to his case. See U.S.S.G. § 1.10(a)(2). This is true because Miles did not receive “status points.” Additionally, Miles's status as a career offender keeps his criminal history category at level VI. Finally, Miles's plea agreement provides that he “waives the right to have the sentence modified pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3582(c)(2) ....” Doc. No. 449 at 3. Because Miles knowingly and voluntarily entered into his plea agreement, he is not entitled to relief. See United States v. Cowan, 781 Fed.Appx. 571, 571-72 (8th Cir. 2019) (per curiam) (affirming dismissal of a § 3582(c)(2) motion when the record established that the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered the plea agreement).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Miles

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 25, 2024
4:18-CR-00466-BSM (E.D. Ark. Mar. 25, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Miles

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. LEWIS MILES DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Mar 25, 2024

Citations

4:18-CR-00466-BSM (E.D. Ark. Mar. 25, 2024)