From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Meyers

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 19, 2005
144 F. App'x 662 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

September 12, 2005.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

U.S. Attorney, USSD--Office of The U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Walter K. Pyle, Esq., Berkeley, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Barry T. Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-01-01171-BTM.

Before: REINHARDT, RYMER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Enrique B. Meyers appeals his 72-month sentence imposed following a jury trial conviction for bringing an illegal alien without permission in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(iii). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We remand the sentence for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).

REMANDED.


Summaries of

United States v. Meyers

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 19, 2005
144 F. App'x 662 (9th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

United States v. Meyers

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Enrique B. MEYERS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 19, 2005

Citations

144 F. App'x 662 (9th Cir. 2005)