From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mendoza-Roman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Mar 8, 2013
No. CR 12-687 SBA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2013)

Opinion

No. CR 12-687 SBA

03-08-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANA MENDOZA-ROMAN, RICARDO MENDOZA-ROMAN, Defendants.

MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612) United States Attorney MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630) Chief, Criminal Division CHRISTINA McCALL (CABN 234139) Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for the United States of America JOYCE LEAVITT Attorney for Ana Mendoza-Roman SEVERA KEITH Counsel for Ricardo Mendoza-Roman


MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)
United States Attorney
MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630)
Chief, Criminal Division
CHRISTINA McCALL (CABN 234139)
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for the United States of America

STIPULATED REQUEST TO SET

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA AND

SENTENCING ON APRIL 12, 2013 AND

TO EXCLUDE TIME UNDER THE

SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

The parties reached an agreement pursuant to Rule 11(c)(1)(C) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and submitted the proposed plea agreement to the Court. To allow time for the Court to consider the proposed plea agreement and for the United States Probation Office finalize pre-plea Presentence Investigation Report by, the parties request that this matter be set on April 12, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. for acceptance of plea and sentencing (assuming the proposed plea agreement is acceptable to the Court). Defendants agree that the Court may review the pre-plea Presentence Investigation Report even though they have not yet pleaded guilty. Since the proposed plea agreement has been submitted to the Court, the parties further stipulate and agree that the time between the date of this stipulation and April 12, 2013 should be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, and specifically pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(G), for consideration by the Court of a proposed plea agreement to be entered into by the defendants and the attorney for the government. The assigned United States Probation Officer is available on April 12. _______________
CHRISTINA M. McCALL
Assistant United States Attorney
Counsel for United States
_______________
JOYCE LEAVITT
Attorney for Ana Mendoza-Roman
_______________
SEVERA KEITH
Counsel for Ricardo Mendoza-Roman

The parties requested that time be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act between the date of this stipulation and April 12, 2013 to allow time for the Court to consider the proposed plea agreement to be entered into by the defendant and the attorney for the government, and to allow time for the preparation of a pre-plea Presentence Investigation Report by the United States Probation Office. Defendant agreed that the Court may review the pre-plea Presentence Investigation Report even though he has not yet pleaded guilty. Good cause appearing therefor, and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(G),

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is set for acceptance of plea and sentencing on April 12, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. , and that time between the date of this stipulation and April 12, 2013 is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(G), for consideration by the Court of a proposed plea agreement to be entered into by the defendant and the attorney for the government.

_______________

HON. SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Mendoza-Roman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Mar 8, 2013
No. CR 12-687 SBA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Mendoza-Roman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANA MENDOZA-ROMAN, RICARDO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Mar 8, 2013

Citations

No. CR 12-687 SBA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2013)