From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mendoza-Bahena

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
May 13, 2013
No. 4-13-70494-MAG (N.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)

Opinion

No. 4-13-70494-MAG

05-13-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. AHUIZOTI MENDOZA-BAHENA, Defendant.

MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612) United States Attorney MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630) Chief, Criminal Division AARON D. WEGNER (CABN 243809) Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for the United States


MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)
United States Attorney
MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630)
Chief, Criminal Division
AARON D. WEGNER (CABN 243809)
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for the United States

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND

STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE

FROM MAY 21, 2013 TO JUNE 19, 2013

AND EXCLUDING TIME FROM THE

SPEEDY TRIAL ACT CALCULATION

(18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A)) AND

WAIVING TIME LIMITS UNDER RULE

5.1

An arraignment or preliminary hearing is currently scheduled in the case on May 21, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. With the agreement of the parties, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court enters this order scheduling an arraignment or preliminary hearing date of June 19, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. before the duty magistrate judge, and documenting the defendant's waiver of the preliminary hearing date under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1 and the exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b), from May 21, 2013 to June 19, 2013. The parties agree, and the Court finds and holds, as follows:

1. The defendant is currently in custody.

2. The defendant agrees to an exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv) to provide reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

3. The defendant waives the time limits of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1 for preliminary hearing.

4. Counsel for the defense believes that postponing the preliminary hearing is in his client's best interest, and that it is not in his client's interest for the United States to indict the case during the normal 14-day timeline established in Rule 5.1.

5. The Court finds that, taking into the account the public interest in the prompt disposition of criminal cases, these grounds are good cause for extending the time limits for a preliminary hearing under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1. Given these circumstances, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by excluding the period from May 21, 2013 to June 19, 2013, outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

6. Accordingly, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court (1) sets a preliminary hearing date before the duty magistrate judge on June 19, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., and (2) orders that the period from May 21, 2013 to June 19, 2013, be excluded from the time period for preliminary hearings under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1 and from Speedy Trial Act calculations under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B)(iv). IT IS SO STIPULATED:

____________________________

JOYCE LEAVITT

Attorney for Defendant

____________________________

AARON D. WEGNER

Assistant United States Attorney
IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

HON. KANDIS A . WESTMORE

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Mendoza-Bahena

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
May 13, 2013
No. 4-13-70494-MAG (N.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Mendoza-Bahena

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. AHUIZOTI MENDOZA-BAHENA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: May 13, 2013

Citations

No. 4-13-70494-MAG (N.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)