From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mendez-Soto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 1, 2011
No. CR-S-11-0236-LKK (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2011)

Opinion

No. CR-S-11-0236-LKK

08-01-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FORTINO MENDEZ-SOTO Defendant.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender DOUGLAS BEEVERS, U.S.V.I. Bar #766 Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service Attorney for Defendant FORTINO MENDEZ-SOTO


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

DOUGLAS BEEVERS, U.S.V.I. Bar #766

Assistant Federal Defender

Designated Counsel for Service

Attorney for Defendant

FORTINO MENDEZ-SOTO

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

Date: August 16, 2011

Time: 9:15 a.m.

Judge: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton

The parties request that the status conference in this case be continued from August 2, 2011, to August 16, 2011 at 9:15 a.m. They stipulate that the time between August 2, 2011 and August 16, 2011 should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that counsel for the defendant may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). Specifically, counsel needs additional time to negotiate a resolution to this matter. The parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. §(7)(B)(iv).

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL BRODERICK

Federal Defender

DOUGLAS BEEVERS

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

FORTINO MENDEZ-SOTO

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

MICHELE BECKWITH

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and the stipulation of all parties, it is ordered that the status conference presently set for August 2, 2011, be continued to August 16, 2011, at 9:15 a.m. Based on the representation of counsel and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. It is ordered that time from the date of this Order, to and including, the August 16, 2011, status conference shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T-4.

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Stip and Order


Summaries of

United States v. Mendez-Soto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 1, 2011
No. CR-S-11-0236-LKK (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Mendez-Soto

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FORTINO MENDEZ-SOTO Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 1, 2011

Citations

No. CR-S-11-0236-LKK (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2011)