Opinion
No. 3:10-cr-126
05-22-2012
(Phillips/Guyton)
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge H. Bruce Guyton on February 7, 2012, [Doc. 101], recommending that the Court deny Defendant's Motion to Suppress Defendant's Statements [Doc. 24] and Motion to Suppress Search Warrant and Evidence Recovered [Doc. 25]. Despite the Court's granting of Defendant's four requests for extensions of time within which to respond to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Docs. 105, 108, 110, 112], Defendant has not filed a timely objection, and enough time has passed since the filing of the Report and Recommendation to treat any such objections as having been waived. See 20 U.S.C. § 636(b); Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b)(2).
After a careful review of this matter, the Court is in complete agreement with Magistrate Judge Guyton's conclusion that Defendant's motions to suppress should be denied. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the Report and Recommendation under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Rule 59(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It is ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling, that Defendant's Motion to Suppress Defendant's Statements [Doc. 24] and Motion to Suppress Search Warrant and Evidence Recovered [Doc. 25] are hereby DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ENTER:
Thomas W. Phillips
United States District Judge