From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Melendez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 11, 2018
Criminal No. 13-252 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 11, 2018)

Opinion

Criminal No. 13-252

10-11-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. EDRED MELENDEZ, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Defendant Edred Melendez ("defendant") is in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") at Federal Correctional Institution Miami ("FCI Miami"). Pending before the court is defendant's request via a letter addressed to the undersigned judge for the court to recommend to the BOP that he serve the remainder of his sentence at a camp facility. (ECF No. 1447.) For the reasons set forth in this memorandum opinion, defendant's request will be denied.

"It is beyond question that the BOP is authorized to designate the place of a prisoner's imprisonment." United States v. Harris, Crim. Action No. 02-385, 2004 WL 350171, at *1 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 10, 2004) (citing 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b)). The BOP is granted that discretion because it is in the best position to evaluate whether a prisoner meets the requirements for placement in a specific facility under BOP Policy Statement 5100.08. Here, defendant seeks a recommendation from the court that he be permitted to serve the remainder of his sentence at a camp facility. A court at the time of sentencing may make a recommendation to the BOP about the placement of a defendant at a specific BOP facility based upon the court's knowledge of the defendant at that time. This court, however, presently lacks sufficient knowledge about defendant's activities within the BOP to make a recommendation to the BOP about his placement. In other words, the court is not in a position to evaluate whether defendant meets the requirements set forth by the BOP to qualify for placement at a camp facility under BOP Policy Statement 5100.08, and, therefore, the court cannot recommend to the BOP that defendant be permitted to serve the remainder of his sentence at a camp facility. Defendant's motion for court recommendation (ECF No. 1447) will, therefore, be denied.

Defendant, however, should be commended for his behavior that resulted in the lowering of his "custody points" and obtaining his General Equivalency Diploma while incarcerated. The court in consideration of defendant's request for a recommendation will send a letter to Warden Kenny Atkinson of FCI Miami to request that the BOP review defendant's file to determine if he qualifies for placement at a camp facility.

An appropriate order will be entered.

By the court, Dated: October 11, 2018

/s/ JOY FLOWERS CONTI

Joy Flowers Conti

Chief United States District Court Judge Cc:
Edred Melendez
#59175-018
FCI Miami
P.O. Box 779800
Miami, Florida 33177


Summaries of

United States v. Melendez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 11, 2018
Criminal No. 13-252 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 11, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Melendez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. EDRED MELENDEZ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Oct 11, 2018

Citations

Criminal No. 13-252 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 11, 2018)