From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Medina-Prado

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 9, 2012
NO. 2:10-CR-0411 LKK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 2:10-CR-0411 LKK

01-09-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO MEDINA-PRADO, Defendant.

Paul Hemesath Assistant United States Attorney Counsel for Plaintiff Clemente Jimenez Counsel for Defendant ALEJANDRO MEDINA-PRADO


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

PAUL A. HEMESATH

Assistant U.S. Attorney

501 I Street, 10th Floor

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 554-2932

ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE


COURT: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Paul Hemesath, and counsel for Plaintiff; and Clemente Jimenez for ALEJANDRO MEDINA-PRADO, that the above status conference be rescheduled from this Court's January 10, 2012, calendar, and that the matter be re-calendared for January 24, 2012, at 9:15 a.m. This request is made jointly by the government and defense in order to permit time for continued preparation, including investigation which is currently in progress, and plea negotiations.

Specifically, the parties have agreed, in principle, to proceed by way of superseding indictment, to be followed by an immediate change of plea. The parties require the additional two weeks requested to complete the proposed court filings, and to complete final investigations.

The parties agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that time be excluded through

January 24, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), Local Code T-4.

______________

Paul Hemesath

Assistant United States Attorney

Counsel for Plaintiff

______________

Clemente Jimenez

Counsel for Defendant

ALEJANDRO MEDINA-PRADO

ORDER

Based on the reasons set forth in the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the status conference currently scheduled for Tuesday, January 10, 2012, be vacated and that the case be set for Tuesday, January 24, 2012, at 9:15 a.m. The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting such a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the parties' stipulation, the time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act is excluded during the time period from the date of this stipulation, January 6, 2012, through and including January 24, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A)&(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4.

______________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Medina-Prado

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 9, 2012
NO. 2:10-CR-0411 LKK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Medina-Prado

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO MEDINA-PRADO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 9, 2012

Citations

NO. 2:10-CR-0411 LKK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)