From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Medina-Prado

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 6, 2011
Case No.: 10-411 LKK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 10-411 LKK

09-06-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO MEDINA-PRADO, Defendant.

PAUL HEMESATH Attorney for Plaintiff CLEMENTE M. JIMÉNEZ Attorney for Alejandro Medina-Prado


CLEMENTE M. JIMÉNEZ, SBN 207136

Attorney for Defendant

ALEJANDRO MEDINA-PRADO

STIPULATION AND ORDER

VACATING DATE, CONTINUING

CASE, AND EXCLUDING TIME

JUDGE: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Paul Hemesath, Counsel for Plaintiff, and Attorney Clemente M. Jiménez, Counsel for Defendant ALEJANDRO MEDINA-PRADO, that the status conference scheduled for September 7, 2011, at 9:15 a.m., be vacated and the matter continued to this Court's criminal calendar on October 4, 2011, at 9:15 a.m. for further status conference. The matter is near resolution. The defense seeks additional time to gather and provide information to the government to that end. The parties anticipate that the matter will either resolve on October 4, or be ready to set trial dates.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that time for trial under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3161 et seq. be tolled pursuant to Section 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), (Local code T-4), and that the ends of justice served in granting the continuance and allowing the defendants further time to prepare outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant to a speedy trial.

PAUL HEMESATH

Attorney for Plaintiff

CLEMENTE M. JIMÉNEZ

Attorney for Alejandro Medina-Prado

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED, that the status conference in the above-entitled matter, scheduled for September 7, 2011, at 9:15 a.m., be vacated and the matter continued to October 4, 2011, at 9:15 a.m. for further status conference. The Court finds that time under the Speedy Trial Act shall be excluded through that date in order to afford counsel reasonable time to prepare. Based on the parties' representations, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants to a speedy trial.

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10cr0411.stipo.0906.1.doc

09/07/11


Summaries of

United States v. Medina-Prado

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 6, 2011
Case No.: 10-411 LKK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Medina-Prado

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO MEDINA-PRADO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 6, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 10-411 LKK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2011)