From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Medina-Prado

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 17, 2011
NO. 2:10-CR-0411 LKK (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)

Opinion

NO. 2:10-CR-0411 LKK

10-17-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO MEDINA-PRADO, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney PAUL A. HEMESATH Assistant U.S. Attorney


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

PAUL A. HEMESATH

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

The parties appeared before the Court on October 11, 2011, in case number 2:10-CR-0411 LKK. At that time, based upon the representations and agreement of all counsel, the Court ordered that the status conference set for October 11, 2011, at 9:15 a.m., be continued to November 1, 2011, at 9:15 a.m., and that the time beginning October 11, and extending through November 1, 2011, was excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. 18 U.S.C. § 3161.

The exclusion of time is appropriate due to the defense counsel's need to prepare. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii) and (iv); Local Code T4. A continuance is necessary in this case in order to ensure defense counsel has a reasonable amount of time to review the evidence given the limitations imposed by Congress. It is also necessary to ensure defense counsel's effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv); Local Code T4.

ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby ordered that the status conference set for October 11, 2011, at 9:15 a.m., be continued to November 1, 2011, at 9:15 a.m., and that the time beginning October 11, 2011, and extending through November 1, 2011, be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The Court finds that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Medina-Prado

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 17, 2011
NO. 2:10-CR-0411 LKK (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Medina-Prado

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO MEDINA-PRADO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 17, 2011

Citations

NO. 2:10-CR-0411 LKK (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)