From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. McQueen

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division
Jul 16, 2024
No. 24-20136 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 16, 2024)

Opinion

24-20136

07-16-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JERRY MCQUEEN, Defendant.


ORDER STRIKING IMPROPER FILING

DAVID M. LAWSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

On July 15, 2024, counsel for the defendant filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record for the defendant. Contemporaneously with that motion, he filed a document styled as a “Notice of Hearing,” which indicates that the motion will be heard at a date and time to be set by the Court. This filing is impertinent and tends to confuse the record because the Court itself will notice a prompt hearing on the counsel's motion to withdraw. The Court therefore will order that the document be stricken.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Notice of Hearing (ECF No. 28) is STRICKEN.


Summaries of

United States v. McQueen

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division
Jul 16, 2024
No. 24-20136 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 16, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. McQueen

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JERRY MCQUEEN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division

Date published: Jul 16, 2024

Citations

No. 24-20136 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 16, 2024)