From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. McGrath

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 31, 2012
Case No. 12-209 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 12-209 GEB

07-31-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL MCGRATH Defendant.

MARK J. REICHEL Attorney for defendant BENJAMIN WAGNER United States Attorney KYLE REARDON Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


MARK J. REICHEL, State Bar #155034

THE LAW OFFICES OF MARK J. REICHEL

Attorney for Defendant

DANIEL MCGRATH

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

STATUS CONFERENCE; ORDER

THEREON


Date: August 3, 2012

Judge: GARLAND E. BURRELL

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, KYLE REARDON, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and MARK J. REICHEL, Esq., attorney for defendant, that the present date for the status hearing be re calendared for August 3, 2012.

This continuance is requested as defense counsel needs adequate time to prepare for the case, and the defense is still reviewing the discovery and will be researching matters. As well, defense counsel will be in negotiations with the government in an effort to resolve the case.

Accordingly, all counsel and defendant agree that time under the Speedy Trial Act from the date this stipulation is lodged, through August 3, 2012 should be excluded in computing the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (H)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4.

Respectfully submitted,

MARK J. REICHEL, ESQ.

_______________

MARK J. REICHEL

Attorney for defendant

BENJAMIN WAGNER

United States Attorney

MARK J. REICHEL for:

KYLE REARDON

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. For the reasons set forth above, the court finds that there is GOOD CAUSE for the continuance and the exclusion of time, and that the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Time is excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4.

____________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. McGrath

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 31, 2012
Case No. 12-209 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. McGrath

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL MCGRATH Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 31, 2012

Citations

Case No. 12-209 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2012)