From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. McGrath

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 7, 2011
No. 1:10-cr-00131 AWI (E.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2011)

Opinion

No. 1:10-cr-00131 AWI

09-07-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARK MCGRATH, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney KAREN ESCOBAR Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender CHARLES J. LEE Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant MARK MCGRATH


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

CHARLES J. LEE, Bar #221057

Assistant Federal Defender

Designated Counsel for Service

Attorney for Defendant

MARK MCGRATH

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

JUDGE: Hon. Anthony W. Ishii

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel that the status conference in the above-captioned matter now set for September 12, 2011, may be continued to October 3, 2011 at 11:00 P.M.

This continuance is at the request of defense counsel as the parties have reached a resolution but Mr. McGrath travels from Bakersfield by train and needs to make arrangements to attend court. It is defense counsels understanding that the case, currently set for 11:00 a.m. on September 12, will be moved to the 8:30 a.m. calendar. Because of the difficulty for Mr. McGrath to arrive at that time, this continuance is requested.

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded in the interests of justice, including but not limited to, the need for the period of time set forth herein for effective defense preparation and for plea negotiation purposes pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv).

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: KAREN ESCOBAR

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

By: CHARLES J. LEE

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

MARK MCGRATH

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. McGrath

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 7, 2011
No. 1:10-cr-00131 AWI (E.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. McGrath

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARK MCGRATH, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 7, 2011

Citations

No. 1:10-cr-00131 AWI (E.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2011)