A Pennsylvania district court opinion dealt with a defendant who was indicted for defrauding the principal, i.e. , Medicare, not a third-party administrator. United States v. McGill, No. 12-112-01, 2016 WL 8716240, at *1–2 (E.D. Pa. May 13, 2016). The district court reasoned that the third-party administrator could be viewed as an agent of Medicare and any actions the administrator took could be attributable to Medicare.
A Pennsylvania district court opinion dealt with a defendant who was indicted for defrauding the principal, i.e., Medicare, not a third-party administrator. United States v. McGill, No. 12-112-01, 2016 WL 8716240, at *1-2 (E.D. Pa. May 13, 2016). The district court reasoned that the third-party administrator could be viewed as an agent of Medicare and any actions the administrator took could be attributable to Medicare.