From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. McFarling

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 19, 2011
1:10-cr-00386-OWW (E.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2011)

Opinion

1:10-cr-00386-OWW

08-19-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL SHANE MCFARLING, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney JEREMY R. JEHANGIRI Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America Jeremy R. Jehangiri Assistant United States Attorney Victor M. Chavez Attorney for Defendant, Michael Shane McFarling


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

JEREMY R. JEHANGIRI

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Plaintiff

United States of America

STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT TO

CONTINUE JURY TRIAL DATE;

ORDER

Honorable Oliver W. Wanger

The United States of America, by and through Assistant United States Attorney Jeremy R. Jehangiri, and Defendant Michael Shane McFarling, by and through his counsel, Victor M. Chavez, submit this stipulation for the Court's consideration.

IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED:

1. The parties request that the jury trial date in this case be continued from September 27, 2011, to December 6, 2011, at 9:00 a.m.

2. The parties stipulate that the time between September 27, 2011, and, through and excluding, December 6, 2011, should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act.

3. The attorney for the United States will be engaged in two jury trials in the month of September, with the first beginning September 7 and likely concluding the following week, and with the second beginning September 20 and likely concluding September 23 or 27. The undersigned counsel for the United States requests this continuance to maintain continuity of counsel and allow counsel a reasonable amount of additional time to engage in necessary and effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

4. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that counsel for the United States and the defendant may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

5. The parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

6. The parties are also engaged in extensive plea negotiations, and this case may be resolved without a trial. The parties stipulate that further discussions relating to a plea agreement and additional time to engage in such plea negotiations would allow for effective representation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and for efficient use of the Court's time and resources.

SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

Jeremy R. Jehangiri

Assistant United States Attorney

Victor M. Chavez

Attorney for Defendant,

Michael Shane McFarling

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Oliver W. Wanger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. McFarling

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 19, 2011
1:10-cr-00386-OWW (E.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. McFarling

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL SHANE MCFARLING, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 19, 2011

Citations

1:10-cr-00386-OWW (E.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2011)