From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. McDowell

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Mar 10, 2014
No. 13-30041 (9th Cir. Mar. 10, 2014)

Opinion

No. 13-30041 D.C. No. 3:04-cr-05193-RBL

03-10-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WILLIAM EMORY McDOWELL, Defendant - Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding

Before: PREGERSON, LEAVY, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

William Emory McDowell appeals from the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), McDowell's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided McDowell the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. McDowell

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Mar 10, 2014
No. 13-30041 (9th Cir. Mar. 10, 2014)
Case details for

United States v. McDowell

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WILLIAM EMORY McDOWELL…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 10, 2014

Citations

No. 13-30041 (9th Cir. Mar. 10, 2014)