"Once a police officer has a reasonable basis for believing there is probable cause, he is not required to explore and eliminate every theoretically plausible claim of innocence before making an arrest" (Ricciuti v N.Y.C. Transit Authority, 124 F.3d 123, 128 [2d Cir 1997]). Although there was evidence uncovered in the investigation that did not implicate Plaintiff, none of the evidence available prior to his arrest was exculpatory (see People vValles, 62 N.Y.2d 36,38 [1984]; Celestin vCity of New York, 581 F.Supp.2d 420, 432 [EDNY 2008]), and did not negate probable cause (ide, see also HarigvCity of Buffalo, 2023 WL 3579367 [2d Cir, May 22, 2023, No. 22-30-CV]). The victim did not identify Plaintiff in a lineup or photo array, but she also did not identify any other viable suspects.