From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. McCarter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 6, 2012
No. 2:11-cr-117 WBS (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cr-117 WBS

07-06-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LONNELL McCARTER, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney MICHELLE PRINCE Assistant United States Attorney Counsel for Plaintiff DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender JEFFREY L. STANIELS Assistant Federal Defender Counsel for Defendant LONNELL McCARTER


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

JEFFREY L. STANIELS, Bar #91413

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

LONNELL McCARTER

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER CONTINUING CASE


Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb

Date: July 9, 2012

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Michelle Prince, counsel for Plaintiff, and Assistant Federal Defender Jeffrey Staniels, counsel for defendant LONNELL McCARTER, that the status conference scheduled for July 9, 2012, be vacated and the matter continued until October 1, 2012, for further status conference at the request of the defense.

The reason for the continuance is to allow for completion of now-active negotiation regarding possible non-trial resolution of the case and for further trial related investigation in the event terms for non-trial resolution cannot be agreed to. The requested date also accounts for intervening schedule conflicts for vacation, an office retreat and government counsel's trial schedule. At the last status conference the court urged the parties to be prepared to announce resolution or to set a trial date. The parties seek this one additional continuance before doing so.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the interests of justice served by the granting of this continuance outweigh the interests of the defendant and the public in a speedy trial and that time for trial under the Speedy Trial Act should therefore be excluded between July 9, 2012, and October 1, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv), Local Code T-4 (time to prepare).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

_______________

MICHELLE PRINCE

Assistant United States Attorney

Counsel for Plaintiff

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

__________________

JEFFREY L. STANIELS

Assistant Federal Defender

Counsel for Defendant

LONNELL McCARTER

ORDER

The above stipulation of the parties is accepted. The status conference set for July 9, 2012, is VACATED. This case is ordered to be re-calendared on October 1, 2012, for status conference.

The court finds, based on the reasons stated above, that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the interests of the defendant and the public in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

By the Court,

_________________

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. McCarter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 6, 2012
No. 2:11-cr-117 WBS (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. McCarter

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LONNELL McCARTER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 6, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cr-117 WBS (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2012)