Opinion
22-6129
10-20-2022
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. COREY MAYO, Defendant-Appellant.
Corey Mayo, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: October 18, 2022
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:14-cr-00081-HEH-DJN-1)
Corey Mayo, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Corey Mayo appeals the district court's order denying his motions for compassionate release. We have reviewed the record on appeal and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (providing standard), cert. denied, 142 S.Ct. 383 (2021). Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Mayo, No. 3:14-cr-00081-HEH-DJN-1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 20, 2022). We deny Mayo's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED